Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
General Forum Information
Off Topic
EMG's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Synergy/MTS Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Disciple" data-source="post: 1005" data-attributes="member: 56"><p>I've used both passive and active (EMG's 81 and 85) with the RM100 and surprisingly I prefer the passive pickups with the amp head. The EMG's just are not as solid sounding to me w/ this amp. With my Dual Rec they scream - but I just don't dig them as much w/ the RM100. I have 3 guitars fitted w/ EMG's, 2 w/ 81+85 configuration and 1 w/ 81+81. The 81/81 combo works better in my opinion when comparing the two EMG setups with Randall.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps - any other questions let me know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Disciple, post: 1005, member: 56"] I've used both passive and active (EMG's 81 and 85) with the RM100 and surprisingly I prefer the passive pickups with the amp head. The EMG's just are not as solid sounding to me w/ this amp. With my Dual Rec they scream - but I just don't dig them as much w/ the RM100. I have 3 guitars fitted w/ EMG's, 2 w/ 81+85 configuration and 1 w/ 81+81. The 81/81 combo works better in my opinion when comparing the two EMG setups with Randall. Hope this helps - any other questions let me know. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
General Forum Information
Off Topic
EMG's
Top