Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Modular Amps
Modules
MTS vs the real thing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Synergy/MTS Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kc2eeb" data-source="post: 142650" data-attributes="member: 811"><p>That's very subjective and also depends on what the speaker set up is. Fenders actually used .005 mfd in the open back Twin Reverb since the open back cabinet would give enough back loading to the speakers to keep them from distorting at high volume. Remember, Fender was looking for a clean sound. In a closed back cab, you can pass more bass frequencies. .022mfd was probably chosen as an overall compromise, especially when the major market was for "metal" players who want it "tight" and "focused."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kc2eeb, post: 142650, member: 811"] That's very subjective and also depends on what the speaker set up is. Fenders actually used .005 mfd in the open back Twin Reverb since the open back cabinet would give enough back loading to the speakers to keep them from distorting at high volume. Remember, Fender was looking for a clean sound. In a closed back cab, you can pass more bass frequencies. .022mfd was probably chosen as an overall compromise, especially when the major market was for "metal" players who want it "tight" and "focused." [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Modular Amps
Modules
MTS vs the real thing
Top