blacksun
Well-known member
Hi,
Being a mts rack user myself - I wonder what is the secret behind so many guys rather go with a RM50 or RM100?
Personally I always found the concept of a 4 space M4/RM4 preamp much more versatile, with also the possibility to change power amp altogether.
Recently it's come to my attention the lack of a preamp master in the mts heads with the consequence of no possibility to compensate the module signal strength in the FX-loop and hence the potential problem of clipping in effects units.
So why are mts heads so popular (or at least used to be)?
Why did the famous Rack of doom fall into redundancy and was replaced with RM100s, what is the secret!?
Being a mts rack user myself - I wonder what is the secret behind so many guys rather go with a RM50 or RM100?
Personally I always found the concept of a 4 space M4/RM4 preamp much more versatile, with also the possibility to change power amp altogether.
Recently it's come to my attention the lack of a preamp master in the mts heads with the consequence of no possibility to compensate the module signal strength in the FX-loop and hence the potential problem of clipping in effects units.
So why are mts heads so popular (or at least used to be)?
Why did the famous Rack of doom fall into redundancy and was replaced with RM100s, what is the secret!?